Saturday 25 May 2013

Senate passes bill opening more state parks to hunting. Objections remain

trails

The version of the Sportsman Heritage Bill approved by the Senate last week allows hunting and trapping in nine state parks where it was previously prohibited, but includes a 100-yard buffer zone around trails and other designated areas.

Trail users, including hikers, bikers and skiers, objected to earlier versions of the bill because the presence of hunters would deter them from their form of outdoor pursuits.

As Paul Smith reported in Sunday's Journal Sentinel, the buffer was viewed as a compromise.

"We did hear from trail users and others who were concerned about conflicts," said George Meyer, executive director of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.

Assuming Gov. Scott Walker signs the bill, the next step will be left to the Department of Natural Resources staff and board to determine which parks, if any, should remain closed to hunting. Under previous law, the board had to act to open a park for hunting. The new law requires a board vote to close one.

The nine currently restricted are Amnicon Falls, Aztalan, Big Foot Beach, Governor Nelson, Lake Kegonsa, Lakeshore, Merrick, Pattison and Roche-A-Cri. Several of those are opened to the sport during the gun deer season.

Initially, the DNR would keep those open to hunting, according to a department spokesman, Michael Bruhn.

"With the new 100-yard “no-hunting” buffer that was included by the State Senate; we believe that there will be minimal problems associated with this provision," Bruhn wrote Monday. "We have committed to the Legislature that the Department will review any issues or concerns that arise over the course of the first year.

"If something were to arise, we do retain the ability through NRB action to close specific areas or properties on a case by case basis to protect human safety or unique flora/fauna."

Close to Milwaukee, hunting would remain prohibited at Lapham Peak, a popular recreation area with hiking, biking and ski trails. Deed restrictions on 400 acres of land within the DNR property, part of the Southern Unit of the Kettle Moraine State Forest, prohibit hunting there.

Michael McFadzen, a member of the Governor's State Trails Council, was not satisfied with the 100-yard buffer zone established to protect hikers and other non-hunters.

"I agree with the general concept of the Hunting Heritgage Bill, They need to increase numbers due to dwindling use," said McFadzen, a skier and runner from Plymouth.

"But there is no practical reason to allow hunting and trapping in all state parks and trails. State parks and trails are one of the few areas that non-hunters can safely visit during the hunting season.

"There is over five million acres of public lands already open to hunting. Over 50% of Wisconsin population use state parks and trails. Only 20% of Wisconsin residents hunt/trap. There is a huge disconnect here. The amendment does little to allay park/trail supporter concerns."

47 Comments for "Senate passes bill opening more state parks to hunting. Objections remain"

  1. Do you really think it's ok that dogs get caught in traps in state parks while going on an outing with the kids in the family? True story. This is ridiculous and Cathy Stepp has like nil experience with the DNR except being on the board. She's one of Walker's appointees who make no sense. Real estate, anyone?

    hometowner Mar 12, 2012 7:05 PM

  2. This doesn't appear to be family friendly legislation to me.

    gardeningmama Mar 12, 2012 7:11 PM

  3. Dogs? What about the kids?

    gardeningmama Mar 12, 2012 7:12 PM

  4. First off, the State Parks would be CLOSED during hunting. If you live in Milwaukee County, you'd know Whitnal Park is closed for hunting once every year. Secondly, 'traps' cannot be set on public property.

    Some of the comments on this are clearly not from hunters. To simplify this, if people are camping, there won't be hunting. End of discussion.

    KWOakCreek Mar 12, 2012 8:11 PM

  5. These 'traps' that you speak of cannot be set on public property. Who really uses traps do hunt deer?

    KWOakCreek Mar 12, 2012 8:12 PM

  6. or the DNR would block off said weekends for hunting only.

    KWOakCreek Mar 12, 2012 8:12 PM

  7. Yeah [Falk]'s motto "insert here" so, true just as long as you pay [the Unions] enough slush money. It looks pretty much the same when you subsitute Falk for Walker and the Unions for Koch Industries.

    At least corporations are willing to create jobs and Unions, well, they just take more and more money from the people for politicians like FALK.

    KWOakCreek Mar 12, 2012 8:15 PM

  8. Of course everyone on this board is not a hunter. We still use the parks. How are we supposed to know all the ins and outs of hunting season? I go to the parks to see wildflowers in the spring and leaves in the fall? Do you know when trillium blooms?

    I am not against hunting, I am against me or my family getting shot in the woods.

    gardeningmama Mar 12, 2012 8:21 PM

  9. So this is just about deer? What about morning doves and grouse and ducks and so forth? Is that also included? When are their seasons? Is this only about deer hunting or all hunting?

    gardeningmama Mar 12, 2012 8:22 PM

  10. I thought trapping was shooting a different kind of bullet or whatever it is, I didn't think it was setting traps.

    gardeningmama Mar 12, 2012 8:25 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives