Tuesday 21 May 2013

Citations in death of Oak Creek bicyclist add to push for vulnerable user law

cyclists, fatalities

The driver who crossed the center line and killed a bicyclist in Oak Creek has been cited for two traffic violations, after a Milwaukee County prosecutor declined to pursue criminal charges in the case.

The decision follows similar actions by district attorneys across the state, who have declined to prosecute motorists in crashes that kill bicyclists and pedestrians.

Attorneys have based their decisions on the difficulty of making a case for homicide by negligent use of  a vehicle in crashes resulting from illegal actions by motorists. In response, cycling advocates have begun lobbying for a vulnerable user law that would increase the penalties in collisions that kill cyclists, pedestrians and highway workers.

The law would apply directly to the deaths of people like Sam Ferrito.

The 56-year-old was out for an early evening ride on July 17, when Joshua Chomicki, then 18, drove his 2000 Pontiac Sunfire into Ferrito, from behind.

Both Chomicki and Ferrito were traveling southbound in the 11100 block of S. Nicholson Ave.

According to his family, Ferrito was biking against traffic, near the edge of the northbound lane, to protect himself from autos on a stretch of road with a narrow shoulder and limited sight lines.

Police reports show Chomicki crossed the center line, passed into the northbound traffic lane and crashed into Ferrito, near the shoulder on the east edge of the road. Both were just miles from home.

Why Chomicki drifted so far remains a mystery.

“We don’t know. The kid doesn’t know,” said Police Lt. Randall Knitter. “Did he black out or fall asleep?”

In a statement to police, Chomicki reported he blacked out. The next thing he remembered was hearing a loud crash and seeing his windshield breaking.

He had no drugs or alcohol in his system, and was not using a cell phone at the time, according to the police findings.

Milwaukee County Assistant District Attorney Grant Huebner reviewed the police reports and a crash reconstruction prepared by the Wisconsin State Patrol.

“To prove this case, prove criminal negligence, I don’t believe the facts in this case rose to that level,” Huebner said. “Civil negligence, yes, but not criminal negligence.”

State statutes spell out the legal standards of negligent homicide by motor vehicle: that the driver caused the death of the victim; that their actions created a risk of death or great bodily harm; that the risk was unreasonable; and that the driver should have been aware they were creating the unreasonable risk.”

“I couldn’t reach the standard beyond a reasonable doubt,” Huebner said.

Reacting to the justice system’s response to her husband’s death, Marcia Ferrito said she was unsatisfied.

“We are deeply disappointed with the outcome of the investigation and the decision to not press criminal charges,” Ferrito said. “We feel the fines and citations issued are just a slap on the hand.

“He can pay his fines, keep his license and go off on his life. I wish it was that simple for my family. Our lives are changed forever.”

Sam Ferrito, a father of two, was a wedding photographer who also worked a full-time job at Rexnord. He took up biking to improve his fitness and lost 70 pounds.

“My husband was an amazing man and it’s a huge loss for our family,” Marcia Ferrito said.

Similar deaths have resulted in similar disappointments, both emotional and legal, for the families of the victims.

Earlier this year, prosecutors in Waukesha and Outagamie counties declined to issue charges in bicylist deaths.

Michael Gustman, a car dealer from Seymour, was issued a traffic citation for inattentive driving after he crashed into Kris Hanson and her husband, Douglas, riding a tandem bicycle on County Highway EE. Kris Hanson died and Douglas was severely injured.

Gustman told police he did not see the couple riding on the road.

His ticket carries a fine of $187.90. Gustman has pleaded not guilty.

In September, the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department issued three traffic citations to Kyle Dieringer of Nashotah. Dieringer crashed into Jeff Littmann and Lauren Jensen, two competitive athletes, on a training ride on Wisconsin Ave. on Oct. 1, 2010.

The 25-year-old driver said he was blinded by the low, early-morning sun and did not see the pair of cyclists.

After District Attorney Brad Schimel declined to issue criminal charges, Dieringer was ticketed for driving too fast for conditions, and two counts of illegal passing. His fines would total $614. He also has pleaded not guilty.

In the Ferrito case, Oak Creek police ticketed Chomicki for driving left of the center line and speeding. The citations carry fines of $206.80.

Deaths like Ferrito’s have motivated the effort to provide increased penalties for motorists guilty of deadly traffic offenses - something between the 10 years in prison tied to a felony homicide by negligent operation of a vehicle and the $100 or $200 traffic ticket.

“To be clear, the intent of this law is not to exact greater punishment on the drivers who kill a pedestrian or bicyclist, but rather to raise the level of expectation for people to take necessary care when they are driving,” said Dave Schlabowske, communications director of the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin.

“Driving a car has become almost an afterthought today rather than a right that comes with great responsibility,” he said. “People with busy lives forget the terrible consequences that lapses in concentration behind the wheel can have.

“The Bike Fed believes a vulnerable user law would help to increase the need for people to focus on their driving and take extra care, perhaps even slow down, when they are on streets with people walking and riding bicycles.”

The Bike Fed is working with state Sen. Dale Shultz (R-Richland Center) to introduce a vulnerable user law when the Legislature returns to business in January. The lobbying effort will be a focal point of the Bike Summit in Madison on Feb. 21.

49 Comments for "Citations in death of Oak Creek bicyclist add to push for vulnerable user law"

  1. Apples and oranges. Cops and hwy workers standing on the side of the road performing job duties the citizens have asked them to do us not the same as bicycles on the road. Teachers who teach safe cycling tell students to act like a vehicle and be predictable. Now in order to change the laws like u suggest will take a re-designation of bikes as non-vehicules, which limits their ability to use the roads.

    Cycling advocates can not have it both ways, meaning they want to be treated as vehicles using the road with all the rights to the road, but then want different laws for how they are treated.

    We will never stop crashes, no matter the cause, but stiffer penalties will not help at all. Educate all users of the road instead and stop promoting a culture of us vs. them.

    Southpaw7 Dec 21, 2011 1:06 PM

  2. ElaineB

    It's called a driver behavior report by police and the state will make the determination of whether a drivers license is lost, not the courts.

    Southpaw7 Dec 21, 2011 1:08 PM

  3. Took some time to look at the records for 2011. There have been 12 bicyclists killed in crashes with motor vehicles in Wisconsin
    In seven of those crashes, the bikers were hit from behind. In one of those, the driver was alleged to have been drunk and was charged with homicide by OWI.
    In one incident, a motorist backed out of driveway and hit the bicyclist.
    In three crashes, the bicyclists crossed into the path of a car that had the right of way.
    In one other instance, the biker was riding in a bike lane, but I have not been able to determine the circumstances of how he was hit.

    Tom Held Dec 21, 2011 2:01 PM

  4. So where does the crash from this story fit? Yes he was struck from behind, but while he was also in violation of the law based on where he was riding. The stats alone do not encompass the unusual circumstances of this case.

    Again, this crash is a poor example to use when advocating for this law.

    Southpaw7 Dec 21, 2011 2:18 PM

  5. Excuse me, folks!! READ THE STORY AGAIN!

    Middleman Dec 21, 2011 2:36 PM

  6. Excuse me, folks!! READ THE STORY AGAIN!

    Middleman Dec 21, 2011 2:36 PM

  7. You make a good point, Southpaw7. This crash is something of an outlier, compared to the circumstances in the other fatalities. I think it does serve as a reminder that driving infractions can have severe consequences, and there is a reason to consider whether those consequences warrant more flexibility in the law for prosecutors.

    Tom Held Dec 21, 2011 2:43 PM

  8. Middleman

    Educate me please as to what I'm missing!

    Southpaw7 Dec 21, 2011 2:50 PM

  9. "Ferrito was biking AGAINST TRAFFIC"!! Sure the kid screwed up, but the "Bikees' Federation" wants blood!! AND TAKE -0- RESPONSIBLITY FOR RULES OF THE ROAD ON A BICYCLE!
    By their standard, a couple vehicles hit, it's an oops, but hit a Bikee and it's a federal crime!
    MADISON: Law enforcement themselves conducted two intersection studies on a stopsign and a red light int.: "97% of the bicyclists ran thru them W/ OUT STOPPING"!
    If I, personally, didn't exercise constant periphery for "Bikees", I would have had 4 hood ornaments in the first 3 yrs of living in Middleton!!!!
    Yet, motorists have to have, 1)a drivers' license; 2)license plate 3)DOT approved vehicle w/ lights/brake & signal lights, and get arrested for RUNNING STOP SIGNS AND RED LIGHTS, unlike Bikees...and they want "vulnerable user laws"!? How about RESPONSIBILITY LAWS-INSTEAD!!

    Middleman Dec 21, 2011 2:51 PM

  10. There are many who feel the way you do. I have also personally had competition trained cyclists blow signs at high speed on a training ride nealy wiping out me and two other motorcycles who had to lock up the brakes at 60 mph. With that said, there are also plenty who follow the law. Just like anything, there will be some who do what they are supposed to and some that won't, both cyclists and motorists.

    We just don't need laws that say there are stiffer penalties and justify them by saying it will make people think about their driving behavior. It is not true, education and enforcement will have a better effect on behavior.

    Southpaw7 Dec 21, 2011 3:21 PM

  11. Let's not stupid here. We have a reputation of being one of the most bicycle friendly states in the nation. This is a reputation that I prefer to keep and even improve upon.

    The young man who rode through our state, Paul Lebell of Bikefree.org told me that he thought we were the very best in the nation.

    JamesWilson Dec 21, 2011 5:46 PM

  12. Really, people cannot still be arguing that bikes should share the road with autos now are they? Tragic yes, unavoidable, NO. Get on a bike path/trail! You want to ride a bike and share the road with semis, trucks, SUVs, and cars then you are taking a RISK, like everyone else. Pretty simple solution no? I practice what I preach. I take my bike to a bike path or I ride in a city/area that has sidewalks. I have never had one close call in all my years of bike riding because I take control over my riding environment.

    HOF Dec 21, 2011 7:08 PM

  13. Thats fine lets make a law like this .But before you do keep in mind this question . Have you as a driver and i mean some one like sam ferito or the republican politition that wants to make this law prepared to do the time if it happens to them . Did any of you and i mean the readers of this article ever and i know you all did including me cross a center line , or run a stop sighn ,or a red light , or go off to the gravel side of the road.Etc Think about it what if there was a bike rider there when we all have done this .And if anyone says they never did there eather a liar or they just got there licence and have not experinced it yet . SO this is my question are you as a driver who can make a mistake ready to do 10 years in prison for something that can happen to anyone at any time...

    dont always buy it Dec 21, 2011 10:32 PM

  14. dont always buy it - As the blog post pointed out, the vulnerable user law would provide for penalties beyond the fine of a traffic citation, but far less than the 10-year felony. Other states have set penalties in the range of $1,000 and a loss of driving priveleges, and minimal jail time.

    The question to ask about opposition or support for a vulnerable user law is this: Should the law provide for a sanction against a motorist who commits a traffic violation that leads to a death beyond a civil citation and $100 to $200 fine?

    Tom Held Dec 22, 2011 7:56 AM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives