Tuesday 21 May 2013

Bill to open Wisconsin and its parks for hunting moves to Senate hearing

trails

Upon his election, Gov. Scott Walker declared “Wisconsin is open for business.”

A bill set for a public hearing Wednesday morning would add a variation, “Wisconsin is open for hunting.”

An amendment to the “Sportsman Heritage Bill” headed to the Senate early next year would open all 48 state parks to hunting and trapping, unless the Department of Natural Resources Board voted to close a park or portions of it. It reverses the current management practice: state parks are closed to hunting unless the DNR board acts to open them for such activities.

Close to Milwaukee, the Lapham Peak recreation area, part of the Southern Unit of the Kettle Moraine State Forest, would stay closed to hunting due to deed restrictions on roughly 400 acres of land within the DNR property.

Other land in the Kettle Moraine State Forest has been and would remain open to hunting.

Given that the DNR currently allows hunting in all but nine state parks, the legislation imposes a subtle shift, but one that has drawn opposition from recreational users – namely hikers, bikers and skiers.

(The nine state parks now closed to hunting are Amnicon Falls, Aztalan, Big Foot Beach, Governor Nelson, Lake Kegonsa, Lakeshore, Merrick, Pattison and Roche-A-Cri and several of those are opened to the sport during the gun deer season.)

Michael McFadzen, a silent sports enthusiast and member of the Governor’s Wisconsin Trails Council, wrote that the shift would drive people away from their non-lethal pursuits on the trails across the state.

“I am unequivocally opposed to this law as it will displace traditional park and trail users,” McFadzen wrote to DNR officials.

“There are approximately five million acres in Wisconsin that are open to hunting,” he said. “It doesn't make sense to open more lands in the face of decreasing hunter numbers. State Park and Trails are used by a majority of Wisconsin residents as a way getting into nature. Many families will avoid this healthy recreation during prime autumn park/trail usage when hunters are on these properties.”

The biggest conflicts would occur in the fall, from the time small-game hunting opens in September through November and December and the popular and profitable deer hunting season. While park use declines during those months, it remains significant, with upwards of 744,000 visits in November and December, based on DNR figures.

The shift in the regulation of hunting in state parks is one element of Assembly Bill 311, created to reverse the downward trend of hunting licenses sold and hunters in the state. The number of licensed deer hunters dropped from 935,000 to 800,372 from 2005 to 2009, according to DNR figures cited by the Wausau Daily Herald.

A University of Wisconsin-Madison study released in February and quoted by the Daily Herald showed that the number of hunters in Wisconsin could drop 27% from 2009 to 2030.

State Rep. Jim Steineke (R-Kaukauna), one of the bill’s sponsors, said the intent was to provide more opportunities for use of the state-owed lands.

“The idea here I that if it’s taxpayer-owned land, the presumption should be they are open, unless there is a good reason for them to be closed,” he said. “I’m of the mind that if there’s a good reason it’s closed off now, it should remain so.

“First and foremost, public safety has to be addressed.”

The public hearing on the bill (Senate Bill 226) is scheduled to start at 11 a.m. before the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment. The Assembly approved its version of the bill in October, on an 84-12 vote.

It also has been approved by the Joint Finance Committee and would be taken up by the full senate when it returns to session in January.

For more details and reporting on the bill, click here for a piece written by Patrick Durkin, in the December issue of Silent Sports Magazine.

Durkin makes the point that reducing the deer herd in state parks serves an important role in protecting native vegetation: “Recent research by University of Wisconsin botanists documented that state parks without deer hunting typically suffered some of the area's worst growth and regeneration of native vegetation.

“Further, when parks aren't open to deer hunting, they become de facto refuges, allowing deer herds to overpopulate and inflict extensive damage to nearby private crops, trees, shrubbery and other property. And in areas with chronic wasting disease, the DNR promotes hunting in state parks to prevent them from becoming CWD repositories. “

43 Comments for "Bill to open Wisconsin and its parks for hunting moves to Senate hearing"

  1. This is insane! Instead of enjoying the beauty of nature, I'll be able to view an animal struggling (or dead) in a trap! I thought it was a joke when the Conservation Congress (now that's an oxymoron if ever there was one) proposed it, but I guess nothing with this administration is amusing.

    Dec 07, 2011 7:30 AM

  2. Are you really in the forest during the end of November during those 9 days? That is the only time you will see blaze orange. My guess is you won't be out there when it's 20-30 degrees out.

    winbadgers Dec 07, 2011 7:46 AM

  3. It is hunting license and surcharge taxes that pay for the purchase and maintenance of most of these areas. Hunting season is short. The birdwatchers and hikers have 10 months to enjoy them. When was the last time a birdwatching license paid for anything?

    theshaft Dec 07, 2011 7:52 AM

  4. As a silent sport advocate and a non hunter, I support a deer season in Nov for the reasons stated in the article. I think the issue really is the opening of the lands during small game season when the parks are packed with all kinds of differant activities. Safety is the obvious first problem but I also think that hunting and the other park activities are mutually exclusive.

    As a XC skier, I have skiied at Nine Mile (Wausau) during a special hunting period and there most of the hunters followed the rules. I did however see where someone gutted a deer on the trail and proceeded to drag the deer out on said trail. I think they were fortunate that I was not training for a biatholon that day.

    rebus Dec 07, 2011 8:15 AM

  5. Big Foot Beach gets a lot of school group use (High School next door)during the fall season.

    big grizz Dec 07, 2011 8:24 AM

  6. Is Walker nuts? Put your hands down. That was a rhetorical question.

    SanMan Dec 07, 2011 9:04 AM

  7. There are LOTS of people who like to use State Parks during the hunting season - just look at the parking lot at Lapham Peak during that time. It is PACKED because that is the only place to go. Why are the minority of residents who are hunters allowed to totally monopolize this public property? We all pay access fees (which many of the cheap hunters don't pay as they park on the roads adjacent to parks to avoid the need for a park sticker) so should have access to parks year around. More public access is warranted, not less.

    Runner Girl Dec 07, 2011 9:04 AM

  8. Check out Runner Girl's comment. Yes, we "birdwatchers and hikers" pay to use our parks in passes and fees.

    Dec 07, 2011 9:10 AM

  9. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/wildlife/hunt/seasdate.htm

    Small Game
    2011 Seasons
    Cottontail Rabbit
    Northern Zone September 17 - February 29, 2012
    Southern Zone October 15 (noon) - February, 29 2012
    Squirrels, Gray and Fox
    Statewide September 17 - January 31, 2012

    This is not a short time period when not many people are using the parks anyways, as a few people have stated. There is plenty of public hunting lands available for people to use and not have to open these parks that are enjoyed by those not hunting that day. I myself, enjoy using the state parks for hiking, running, canoeing, and camping. I also enjoy hunting and have found numerous areas both public and private land to participate in that activity. Hunting licenses aren't the only thing that help pay for the purchase and maintenance of state parks, vehicle admission stickers alone are a huge chunk of money. If this was only going to be during gun deer season only, I might be able to go along with it because of the length of time, but it isn't.

    RY19 Dec 07, 2011 9:19 AM

  10. The first poster made the point of blaze orange and rifles. You don't use blaze orange or rifles for any of the hunting activities you state.

    winbadgers Dec 07, 2011 9:36 AM

  11. Everyone comments how they love hiking, running, canoeing, etc. And those are all great activities to enjoy. I just don't understand why you must stop those activities because someone might be hunting. What makes you say, geez I can’t go canoeing today because someone might be bow hunting out there?

    winbadgers Dec 07, 2011 9:39 AM

  12. Hunters are not just monopolizing the public property. They just want fair access as well. What makes it so you can't go running during hunting season? Because some hunter might have a gun??? OMG how unsafe! Just because someone might be hunting, it does not change your access privileges.
    It appears to me some people have hunter/gun phobias.

    winbadgers Dec 07, 2011 9:49 AM

  13. As an avid deer hunter, I say what a great idea. The more public land available for hunting the better. Right now, the public land that is available is over hunted due to the lack of private land available. As for the issue of other people using the parks during the hunting season, this should not be a problem. Poeple tend to scare wildlife away and the hunters will go to other areas. The amount of public parks that are actually used by the public tend to be small, really limited to the trails where as the hunters will be "off the beaten path".

    cfdmpo Dec 07, 2011 9:49 AM

  14. Great! They pay their fair share. But why the hunter phobia? There is not a place in the state where hunting is permitted that you are not allowed to do your activities as well. The hunters share their supposal areas with you. Why can't they share your supposal areas? What can’t runners/bikers/bird watchers coexist?

    winbadgers Dec 07, 2011 9:56 AM

  15. Winbadgers I agree that you should mebe able to share the land during hunting season. But a couple of years ago I was hiking in Kettle Moraine during the deer hunting season and came across a hunter in the woods whose response to me "you better watch out or you'll get your a** shot off out here". I had bright colors on, not blaze orange. But I'm 5 foot 10 inches and have two legs. Do I look like a deer? That situation really turned me off from going anywhere near public hiking trails during hunting season.

    Mitch Cumstein Dec 07, 2011 10:11 AM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives