Saturday 18 May 2013

DOT set to share details, gather opinions on Hoan Bridge bike path

cycling

A meeting hosted by the Department of Transportation Monday night will give residents a two-hour opportunity to ask questions and share opinions about the proposal to add a bike and pedestrian lane on the Daniel Hoan Memorial Bridge.

The meeting in the DOT offices, 1001 W. St. Paul Ave., starts at 5 p.m. DOT planners will make a presentation at 5:15.

The proposal to unify bike paths on the north and south side of the bridge had drawn divided views.

Advocates call it a vital link in a 160-mile corridor of bike paths along the Lake Michigan shoreline, and an affordable addition that will serve commuters and attract tourists.

At a news conference on Wednesday, area legislators and champions of the Hoan Bridge bike path said they had gathered more than 6,000 signatures on petitions stating support of the addition.

Critics say the cost is too high at a time when the state has cut spending for schools and health care, and that the ride over the Hoan would be too steep and windy for most bicyclists.

Last month, the DOT presented five options that survived a feasibility study conducted by the engineering firm Graef USA. The costs range from $9.4 million to close a northbound traffic lane and build a 14-foot path separated from traffic by a concrete barrier, to $95.5 million for a separate structure to carry a bike path over the current bridge.

The full report on the alternatives can be found here.

Proposals that would maintain three lanes of traffic in each direction on the Hoan would cost upward of $95 million, and less-costly options would eliminate a northbound traffic lane and create traffic congestion during the morning and evening peaks.

The report said the bridge's capacity to carry traffic would be inadequate with only two northbound lanes. It also said that northbound traffic averaged 46 mph during the evening rush hour, with one lane closed during the recent repair project.

Even the bike path supporters have focused primarily on the $9.4 million alternative.

“It’s prudent to choose the least expensive option, and we encourage WisDOT and the Federal Highway Administration to look at ways to lower that cost,” wrote Dave Schlabowske, communications director for the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin. “For instance, if it saves money, bicyclists would be happy with a narrower path than the proposed 14 feet.”

A final recommendation will be part of the DOT’s plan to reconstruct the road way atop the 2-mile bridge. That work is expected to cost $275 million to $350 million and begin in 2013.

Federal guidelines for that work will impact the final decision on the Hoan bike lane.

Federal Highway Administration policy holds: “In any case where a highway bridge deck being replaced or rehabilitated with Federal financial participation is located on a highway on which bicycles are permitted to operate at each end of such bridge, and the Secretary determines that the safe accommodation of bicycles can be provided at reasonable cost as part of such replacement or rehabilitation, then such bridge shall be so replaced or rehabilitated as to provide such safe accommodations.”

“Bicyclists and pedestrians should be accommodated in new construction in corridors where there is current or potential demand. Under 23 U.S.C. 217(g), transportation plans must consider bicycle and pedestrian accommodations.”

There are exceptions, however, if the additional cost would exceed 20% of the reconstruction project or the bike lane would reduce the roadway capacity below adequate levels.

Of the proposed alternatives, the more costly options requiring structures added to the Hoan would likely exceed the 20% and the less-costly options would result in inadequate traffic flow, based on DOT estimates.

The FHWA also advised the state road planners to explore other options. One of them, an on-street bike path from Bay View to downtown Milwaukee is now being built. A segment of that path, the raised bike lane on Bay St., opened last month. 

For those who cannot make it to the meeting the DOT is taking input through Nov. 30.

Options include email to the project manager at carolynn.gellings@dot.wi.gov, a letter to WisDOT’s Southeast Regional Office, P.O. Box 798, Waukesha, WI, comment on Facebook@HoanBridge Wisconsin DOT or Twitter@WIHoanBridge.

62 Comments for "DOT set to share details, gather opinions on Hoan Bridge bike path"

  1. I've biked the Hoan. Not difficult. Many hills on streets are tougher, and the wind tunnels between buildings are intense (and, at intersections, more unpredictable than in open areas). Although I would enjoy the option of biking or walking over the bridge, I'd rather they finish the Bay View to downtown off-street route ASAP. A ground-level route would be used more often in iffy weather, and cyclists and motorists could more easily avoid one another.

    Willia67 Nov 11, 2011 3:49 PM

  2. Admittedly, I don't drive that bridge over rush hour, so I don't know how dense the traffic is. So, on average, how many people do you think will use this on a daily basis between the months of November and April? Maybe it doesn't matter. The massive surplus of money the government has makes any project viable regardless of ROI.

    Belger31 Nov 11, 2011 4:01 PM

  3. Mixing fast cars and wind with pedestrians and bikers is not a good idea. I can't think of technological fix at any even remotely reasonable cost to do it.

    What is essentially one County Supervior's dream of a bike path should give way to common sense.

    GfldRay Nov 11, 2011 4:12 PM

  4. An off-street path is going to be built east of 1st street next year making biking from Bay View to Downtown quite safer.

    JTBA Nov 11, 2011 4:39 PM

  5. The wind can get fierce up there.

    JTBA Nov 11, 2011 4:41 PM

  6. The Bay View to downtown off-street route is scheduled to be built next year. Tom did a post on it earlier this year. It's east of 1st street near Barclay St.

    JTBA Nov 11, 2011 4:48 PM

  7. Here's the link to the article. http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/124686578.html

    JTBA Nov 11, 2011 4:50 PM

  8. Given the incredible price of this bridge and the fact that even bikers think it is not realistic, will in itself
    cancel this project.

    Now let's get rid of the trolley and we have saved 250 million...not bad for one days work.

    artattack Nov 11, 2011 5:31 PM

  9. The fact that this idea has gotten this far in this economy (to say nothing about the effect on safety of cars, bikes, and pedestrians) is an indication that some serious changes need to be made at the DOT!

    Listen101 Nov 11, 2011 5:58 PM

  10. Okay, I have no problem with people giving their opinions on this topic, but when people come on here and flat out lie about being an avid cyclist, I have a problem with that. You could not be an avid cyclist and come to the conclusion that you did. I would estimate the bridge would be fairly easy to ride over at least 300 days a year. "Avid" cyclists don't thing we have cold, snowy, rainy, wet, foggy conditions 9 months a year. Do we live in the same city? I and many other bikers get out there the entire year and would only consider a snowstorm (maybe 20 days a year), a very heavy rain (maybe another 20 days a year) or winds over 30 mph (maybe 15 times a year), to be a reason not to ride on a very easy bridge crossing. Little kids and elderly people ride over that bridge no problem in nice weather; don't you think the majority of avid cyclists could do this in less than ideal weather? Avid cyclist. Okay.

    MU82 Nov 11, 2011 8:00 PM

  11. Edit- "Avid" cyclists don't THINK we have.................

    MU82 Nov 11, 2011 8:01 PM

  12. I''m originally from a state where the wind blows pretty much all year. Riding in 30-40mph winds is a way of life. BFD if its windy.

    okiefo Nov 11, 2011 10:34 PM

  13. Why not?

    okiefo Nov 11, 2011 10:34 PM

  14. No credibility as an "avid" cyclist. Casual at best. Wind isn't a big deal. Weather isn't either if you are properly equipped and are hard enough to be out in it. HTFU.

    okiefo Nov 11, 2011 10:38 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives