Friday 24 May 2013

A veteran's suggestions on the Rock 'n Sole: Go south.

running

More than 6,500 people participated in the inaugural Rock ‘n Sole on Sunday, creating 6,500 opinions on how to improve the races that the director contritely admits were seriously flawed.

I’ve participated in other races – notably the Madison Marathon – where the medical tent filled up quickly with runners needing IV solutions because of dehydration and heat exhaustion. I’ve also put myself in a bad situation and made a late-night trip to an emergency room by pushing myself beyond my body’s capacity.

Those experiences give me a veteran’s perspective on the trial and error in endurance sports.

Now recovered, somewhat, from a tough half-marathon in the difficult conditions on Sunday, here are my thoughts on the Rock ‘n Sole.

(Also, check out this post by Trenni Kusnierek, the WTMJ-AM 620 sportscaster who passed me at the 12-mile mark)

Hydration: The lack of cups and fluids on the course is inexcusable, as many participants have noted. That’s easily correctable, and I would expect the problem to be solved next year. The focus needs to be on the participants in the middle and back of the pack.

On that note, I also think participants should take steps to ensure they have a back up (water bottle, Camelbak, etc.), they have trained sufficiently, and adjust to the conditions.

The numbers: In hindsight, it probably would have been wise to cap the field at 5,000 and allow the logistical flaws to be worked out without the overwhelming numbers. Even in year two, a limit on the field would give organizers a firm number for planning - supplies, shirts etc. -  weeks before the start date.

The Hoan: Organizers of both the Miller Lite Ride for the Arts and the Rock ‘n Sole cited a lack of time for set up on the bridge as a problem that prevented a smooth start and flow of traffic early in the events. The arrangements with the Department of Transportation should allow for more time for those logistics. Traffic volumes on the bridge are light in the early-morning, and it seems the organizers should have access at first daylight, if not earlier.

The distance: Again in hindsight, the first running of the Rock ‘n Sole would have been easier to manage as a 10K without the half-marathon. The attraction of the longer race is clear: the half-marathon is the fast-growing distance in running. But the staging of start times for the two races and the longer run were pitfalls that could have been avoided in the first go.

Go south: Running the half-marathon course through the Bay View neighborhood and returning along the Oak Leaf Trail through South Shore Park would provide more shaded areas and more crowd support. Lincoln Memorial Dr. is a beautiful place to run, but it lacks the atmosphere created when people stand in their front yards and offer cheers, cold liquids and a good dousing from a garden hose.

Plus, the half-marathon finish would include that blast down the Hoan back to the Summerfest grounds.

25 Comments for "A veteran's suggestions on the Rock 'n Sole: Go south."

  1. Thank you for the better balanced perspective on the race. As a long time member of the back of the pack, I believe that this race needs to be corrected and encouraged. I'm also rather appalled by the range and depth of the press coverage; I guess it's easier to criticize than praise, and this seems a story with a lot of "drama". I ran (and walked) it, love my finisher medal and will do it again next year.

    Respect your training level, DNQ or walk before you get into big trouble, wear a hat to keep your head shaded, and carry water!

    DansMom Jul 11, 2011 11:18 AM

  2. It's interesting that you mention running the course through Bay View. When I first heard about the run this past winter, I immediately thought that the turn-around would involve exiting 794 by the Coast Guard station, perhaps a loop up Russell and some other area streets before heading back to 794 to finish. When instead I saw that the turn-around would actually take place on 794, I was worried about the congestion of a hair-pin turn. With all the water issues, that seems to have ended up being a non-issue (unless it was worse for each event's front runners). Right now, I'm not sure I will enter next year's event. However, a course change as you suggest might make me reconsider.

    mkerunner711 Jul 11, 2011 11:28 AM

  3. Im far from a running veteran, but I though the setup for the finish line was
    a problem. A bit of a bottle neck and then all of the tables with water, fruit,
    etc... were so close to the finish line that it made runners congregate and
    back up. Being stuck in that hot steamy mass of humanity is where I almost
    lost it.

    daddy needs a drink Jul 11, 2011 12:00 PM

  4. I completely disagree about carrying water for a half marathon road race.
    Carrying your own water is expected during trail ultras where aid stations
    cannot be provided every 1 to 2 miles. In a road race with aid stations
    every 1 to 1.5 miles, expecting water at them is like expecting an engine
    in the car you buy.

    I can somewhat understand when a May or October race has unexpected
    unseasonably warm conditions, and adequate water isn't available, but
    yesterday's conditions were standard issue for July in Wisconsin. There is
    no excuse for not having enough cups and water.

    runner chick Jul 11, 2011 12:07 PM

  5. Everyone who is entering the race is responsible for there own race. As a
    veteran racer, I would never show up to a hot race without my own H2O.
    Granted many people may not have known that. Madison has been
    running their marathon for years and still can't get the water right at hot
    races, why would a first run race get everything right? I knew that going
    in, I expect the glitches to be fixed next year, Summerfest knows how to
    handle people, they just didn't understand the issues with the Hoan and
    how many volunteers would be needed at the aid stations.

    katrs Jul 11, 2011 1:03 PM

  6. "Carrying your own water is expected during trail ultras where aid stations cannot be provided every 1 to 2 miles. In a road race with aid stations every 1 to 1.5 miles, expecting water at them is like expecting an engine in the car you buy."

    I absolutley agree with this. When you enter a race and pay the entry fee you expect the basics to be provided. This includes water at set intervals. This allows runners to not have to carry their own water and be free to run without having to carry a bottle or have on a camelback. What happend was inexcusable. If you want to carry your own water more power to you, but to say someone should be prepared and do so in anticipation of there being no water is just wrong.

    spdsktr5 Jul 11, 2011 1:11 PM

  7. Wow talk about a bunch of Sallys, sorry Sally. Two days of radio and newsprint missing out that You signed up, You should have prepared, You should have taken the step necessary to compete when it’s hot. Then try to blame the race organizer who has years of experience with professional athletes, must be nothing like dealing with weekend warriors. I guess someone should have told him he would need a truck full of crying towels - not t shirts. It’s a race but it really sounds like a lot wanted a full meal and drinks on the course that was laid out perfect with 90% downhill and planned as a well thought out social event. Let me guess everyone gets a medal for finishing.

    ksjc Jul 11, 2011 1:32 PM

  8. Right on ksjc! Run faster and get to the water stations quicker, then you won't have to worry about them running out of water. If you're going to be a back of the pack runner that's fine, think about carrying your own bottle just in case. I've run hundreds of miles with a hand bottle and it doesn't slow you down one bit.

    hotpocket Jul 11, 2011 2:07 PM

  9. Just my guess, With all the water readily available, given the heat and sun, there would have still been medical emergencies. Some runners don't adjust their goals to the conditions.

    J.M. Jul 11, 2011 2:53 PM

  10. Just my guess, With all the water readily available, given the heat and sun, there would have still been medical emergencies. Some runners don't adjust their goals to the conditions.

    J.M. Jul 11, 2011 2:55 PM

  11. Great observations Tom...mostly.

    Extra water bottle, my foot! Carrying water on a run does slow you down
    (what a silly thing to say otherwise, hotpocket) -- that's called a training
    run. I can run a marathon out my door anytime I want, but a race is fun
    partly to see how fast you can go.

    How far do people want to take this "personal responsibility" mantra?
    (And it is a mantra, it is not based on a complete rational analysis).
    What about a marathon that runs out of water, and maybe promised food
    or gel? Clock broken -- should have brought your own watch. Course
    mismarked: bring a map. Fun challenged when training, but you are
    missing the point that this is a product people paid money for -- up to
    $100!

    At the same this weekend, dozens of folks were out at the Hardrock 100
    in Colorado, for up to 48 hours. An aid station (hours apart) running out
    of supplies would have been an emergency -- but doesn't happen when
    people competent in logistics are running the show.

    I do think/hope they'll get it right next time, though.

    madcoca Jul 11, 2011 3:12 PM

  12. It's not just about having water vs. not -- they could have made the race
    $20 cheaper, told everyone to bring their own water, and people could have
    made an informed decision and planned accordingly.

    Instead, they did not receive the experience they were promised.

    madcoca Jul 11, 2011 3:14 PM

  13. Good suggestions. Everyone needs to stop their complaining. I thought Wisconsinites were tough. We will be going to the Packer games on December 25 and January 1 at Lambeau. It is going to be cold outside. We wouldn't think or complaining or blaming the Packers. As seasoned fans we will plan accordingly, take responsibility and cherish the moment.

    Running out of water and cups is inexcusable but come on already...

    tobias Jul 11, 2011 4:06 PM

  14. ksjc:

    Prepared? I prepared by being properly trained, and finding out where the
    aid stations would be, as does any responsible runner. We are not
    complaining that it was hot. I enjoyed that challenge. The problem is
    when a race promises to provide something absolutely necessary, and fails
    to do so.

    If you pay for and attend an all day conference where they said they
    would provide lunch, and then at lunch time they had no food, should we
    blame YOU if you are hungry, and tell you that you should have brought
    your own lunch?

    runner chick Jul 11, 2011 4:11 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives