Saturday 18 May 2013

Wisconsin slips to third in bike-friendly state rankings

cycling

Cycling enthusiasts in Wisconsin could proudly cheer "we're number two" through the first three years of the League of American Bicyclists rankings. Not anymore.

The Badger State fell off the pace a bit and dropped to third in the League's 2011 bike-friendly state rankings, released Monday.

Maine passed Wisconsin into the second spot, behind Washington.

To come up with the rankings, the League gives each state a grade (A through F) in six categories: Legislation, Policies & Programs, Infrastructure, Education & Encouragement, Evaluation & Planning, and Enforcement.

Wisconsin took home As in policies and encouragement and planning; a C in legislation and Ds in infrastructure and enforcement.

That D in infrastructure - bike paths, bike lanes and signs that make cycling easier - was costly. Maine received a B grade for its biking infrastructure, the highest score of the 50 states in the rankings.

As the BikePortland blog explains, dozens of states gave ground on infrastructure by returning millions of dollars in unspent federal transportation enhancement funds.

Kevin Hardman, executive director of the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin, said the advocacy group would use the grades to focus its work.

The Share and Be Aware campaign launched this year to educate motorists and cyclists on the rules of the road should help boost that D in enforcement, he said. Ambassadors have been deployed to meet with local officials, law enforcement and community groups to promote safety.

“These are helpful tools, I would say," Hardman said of the League's report card. " When you’re all the way at the top, it’s not unreasonable to expect there are going to be some movements year-after-year.

"It underscores for me, we have a lot of work ahead of us. We’re working every day to get to number one.”

 

4 Comments for "Wisconsin slips to third in bike-friendly state rankings"

  1. Isn't it strange to see an A in planning and the D in infrastructure? I agree that the infrastructure fur bikes is pretty bad here. Yes, there are a few nice trails here and there, but there is almost no visible overall concept, few connections between trails, many streets which would be good for cycling are in horrible shape. On the other hand, with a bit of good planning (with an A?) and not so high costs the infrastructure good be way better. The streets (eg compared to Europe) are very wide so in many cases it would be straight forward to introduce bike lanes etc.

    sharpie May 24, 2011 4:11 PM

  2. I think more important than our "rating" is the decrease in state funding
    devoted to cycling in the new regime and the growing driver rage against
    cyclists. We need to all get along and share the road. Both drivers and
    cyclists need to change our behavior. Smile...wave...

    camillo May 24, 2011 9:05 PM

  3. given that the WI state govt is in the process of cutting ALL state funding for pedestrian and cycling projects in the next 2 year budget - it's not surprising that WI would drop in the rankings.
    ($5 million was cut from a $6.4 billion 2 year budget - what percent is that?)

    I would guess that WI just went UP in rankings of states, in the annual road builders survey: no train, no sidewalks and no bike lanes/paths - but an EXTRA $400 million for more road building! sweet!

    let's see, will that make the price of gas go down, or up?

    Greg F May 24, 2011 11:17 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives