Sunday 19 May 2013

Budget panel cuts $5 million for bike/pedestrian projects

cycling

Backing Gov. Scott Walker, the Republican majority on the Joint Finance Committee has voted to eliminate $5 million in state support for bicycle and pedestrian paths from the 2011-'13 transportation budget.

Based on the vote 12-4 vote on Tuesday, state support for transportation enhancements from gas tax and related revenue appears to be short-lived, lasting only one budget, 2009-'11.

According to the Department of Administration, money is limited in the $6.4 billion transportation budget, and the elimination of the spending for improvements to bike paths and pedestrian amenities reduces the overall spending.

Most of the money the state spends on improvements for non-motorized transportation comes from federal funds.

The governor's budget projects that the feds will provide nearly $18 million through the transportation enhancements and bike and pedestrian programs over the next two fiscal years. Another $23 million will be available in congestion mitigation grants, which may be used for bike projects.

Kevin Hardman, executive director of the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin, said the action by the Joint Finance Committee cuts a valuable investment.

The state money helps municipalities design biking and pedestrian networks, and to make them more usable.

“What suffers when we don’t make those investments is our economic development, and connecting tourist aspects, for communities up north,” he said. “It compromises our health.

“Bicycling is a choice people make to get around and burn calories. What it compromises is our own competitiveness in attracting people to our state, for tourism and a work force.”

Convincing legislators to reinstate the state dollars for bike and pedestrian projects remains the No. 1 lobbying priority for the Bike Fed, according to Hardman.

“What I am being reminded of is that the perception still exists that bicycling is somehow outside of our transportation system or a nice thing to have,” Hardman said. “We’re working aggressively to change that perception. Bikes are legal vehicles on our roadway and should be accommodated in our transportation system.”

Oak Leaf to Interurban: Federal grant dollars have been used to make improvements to the Oak Leaf and Interurban trails in Milwaukee and Ozaukee counties. In his Over the Bars in Milwaukee blog, Dave Schlabowske covers plans to link the two paths with an off-road connection.

162 Comments for "Budget panel cuts $5 million for bike/pedestrian projects"

  1. Wow, Marquette. What planet are you living on? Wish I had the hydro-plane you have!
    Obviously you have never seen Hwy 41 in winter or on a Sunday when people are heading south.
    Yup. I'm sure you'd rather have more bike trails. But in the real world, people drive cars to get distances. Roads need to be maintained and upgraded to change with the road usages. That's the way it is.

    puzzled May 04, 2011 12:55 PM

  2. I think our legislators better open up their statute books and read more. There is now a law on the books (called Complete Street legislation) which REQUIRES bike and ped accommodations in all reconstruction of state highways. The DOT has to prove that it costs more than 20% of the total cost of the project in order to NOT provide bike accommodations. And if they can't provide bike, they at least need to provide sidewalk for pedestrians. Yes, there are some exceptions (on freeways, where bikes are statutorally prohibited) but it is both a state and federal law now to provide these facilities. All the rescinding of the $5 million does is take away that extra little "cookie jar" the bike nuts liked to use for building more paths off road.

    engineerchick May 04, 2011 12:58 PM

  3. Everyone whining about how "we're broke" doesn't grasp how we got here. The recession resulted in lower state revenues. If Walker and the Republican legislature want to fix our budget deficit, all they have to do is keep their number one campaign promise to create 250,000 jobs. Let's git er done, Republicans. If you don't keep your number one campaign promise and turn Wisconsin's economy around, you're OUT.

    wigwam May 04, 2011 1:02 PM

  4. puzzled-"But in the real world, people drive cars to get distances. Roads need to be maintained and upgraded to change with the road usages. That's the way it is. "
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    That's the way it is only because of narrow sighted people like Walker and those on the right. People drive cars because we continue to be literally forced into use of a vehicle because of a lack of rapid transit options. Other cities states with urban areas similar to the size of Milwaukee (Portland, Ore., Cleveland, OH, etc) have successfully invested in light rail systems. Portland is actually expanding it's lines. In addition, nobody seems to care that oil companies such as Exxon are making record quarterly profits while you and I pay $4.17 for a gallon of gas at the pump.

    I know a ton of people who would chose NOT to drive a vehicle if we had other rapid transit options.

    JsMom46 May 04, 2011 1:05 PM

  5. Recreational bicycling has as big an impact on the state's economy as deer hunting, and we all know how much time, money, and effort Walker is spending on pleasing the hunters. Cyclists have more than paid for their bike lanes.

    wigwam May 04, 2011 1:06 PM

  6. Here's what I would appreciate from republicans and the government; just a little bit of honesty. Stop cloaking yourselves in the 'we're broke' mantra and admit the truth. You have millions for your priorities (rewarding big oil and creating road jobs for campaign contributors, voter i.d., corporate tax breaks and on and on.) Please admit, 'We are not broke, but will not support alternate transporation, education, healthcare for the elderly, small business, communities, or the poor.' We get it, now own it.
    FYI, support of alternate transportation during all time highs for fuel is, well, kind of a smart, forward thinking thing to do...

    Hopeful Wisconsin May 04, 2011 1:06 PM

  7. O2BAlert
    @JSMom46, well put. @Jimtherepublican, spoken like the mouth-breathing, climate-change-denying, foil-hat-wearing racist birther ideologue you and your ilk have become (or have allowed to dominate the dialog of your formerly viable party). "Liberal causes?" What a riot. What about "lunatic causes" that do nothing but ensure the unworkable, unsustainable, backwards-looking status quo? This administration's hypocritical guile and its propensity to legislate via political payback simply know no bounds. So I expect nothing less than rewards for the oil companies, Payne & Dolan and anything stinking of Koch. Disgusting.

    First, Payne & Dolan build the bike trails too, at least here in Milwaukee so I'm not sure what you're talking about. As to climate change or whatever your excuse if for the paths, trails, etc. then pay for them. Charge for bike licenses. You do for cars, truck, and even horse drawn carts in some communities. If you want the trails, pay for them yourselves or raise the money doing fund raisers. If as you seem to be defending, this is a huge boom to a community, then businesses should flood your coffers. I didn't understand why the county didn't sell the naming rights to the bike racks newly installed on the county buses. In a down economy, every penny counts.

    jimtherepublican May 04, 2011 1:06 PM

  8. jsmom46-
    "Hmmm, let's see what "luxury items" we can cut given your analogy. Let's start with the Governor's mansion. Why should we taxpayers pay for a house, utilities, maintenance, service staff, etc. How about a smaller, more efficient house? How about the car that's leased for the governor?"

    Hypocrite. Are you going to claim you felt the same way when Doyle held the office?! Only if you're a liar too.

    Cheesehead May 04, 2011 1:08 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives