Tuesday 21 May 2013

Deaths of cyclists drive lobbying effort for vulnerable users law

cycling, fatalities, advocacy

Pointing to a number of fatal crashes in 2010, bicyclists in Wisconsin will lobby Tuesday for a vulnerable user law and tougher penalties against offending motorists.

About 200 advocates are expected to meet with legislators as part of the third-annual Bike Summit organized by the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin, the largest cycling advocacy group in the state. Their agenda for the lobbying session also contains state money for bike and pedestrian paths and access to land purchased through the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program.

The bikers will have several cases to cite - crashes that killed cyclists - as they argue that the current traffic laws provide inadequate penalties for motorists who commit a moving offense that seriously injures or kills a biker.

In Waukesha County, a 20-year-old driver who hit and killed Brett Netke, 42, while he pedaled on Highway 18 in the Village of Summit was cited for failing to yield three feet of clearance while passing. Samuel Weirick did not contest the citation, and paid a $114 fine.

In Brown County, authorities issued a ticket for an improper left turn to the 39-year-old who hit and killed Reinhold Herzog at a rural intersection in the Town of Wrightstown on Aug. 24.

According to an accident reconstruction, Herzog was stopped in the southbound traffic lane on Blake Rd., waiting to cross Hwy. 96, when the eastbound driver, Todd Gilson, turned his Ford F250 northbound and smashed into the 73-year-old man. Gilson cut the left-hand turn so short that he hit Herzog left of the centerline, according to an accident reconstruction.

Gilson was reportedly distraught after the crash, and told a sheriff’s deputy the sun was in his eyes and he didn’t see Herzog before he hit him.

The reconstruction specialist wrote: “Based on the evidence, I believe the primary factor that contributed to this accident was the improper left turn of Todd Gilson onto Blake Rd. The sun may have been in his eyes, but if he had made the proper turn by statute, this accident would not have occurred.”

Gilson was issued a ticket for an improper left turn, with a fine of $175, but the citation was dismissed on March 22, on a motion by Thomas Coaty, an assistant district attorney in Brown County.

On the same day, Gilson pleaded guilty to a drunken driving offense he committed four months after he killed Herzog.

His fine on the drunken driving ticket was $723.

Online court records show that in previous years Gilson paid a $176.90 fine for parking where prohibited and $273 for driving too fast for conditions. In 2000, he was sentenced to 90 days in jail and 18 months in probation for a battery in 2000.

He paid no legal penalty for killing Herzog.

Still pending in Waukesha County is the case of Jeff Littmann, 56.

A motorist struck and killed the popular bike shop owner, who was riding on Wisconsin Ave. in Nashotah. No charges or citations have been issued, and the case remains under review by the Waukesha County District Attorney.

“People who bicycle have been killed on our roadways and there has been for all intents and purposes no penalty assessed,” said Kevin Hardman, executive director of the Bike Federation. “We’re looking for reasonable ways to create higher accountability for operators on the roadway.”

In New York and Delaware, vulnerable user laws impose tougher penalties for motorists who strike and injure bicyclists, pedestrians, roadway workers and others specified in the statute. Penalties vary from state to state, but typically carry fines up to $1,000 and require violators to complete traffic safety courses.

Hardman said the members of the Bicycle Federation have been talking to legislators, seeking sponsors for a bill in the state.

In recent months, legislators have been focused intensely on the budget debate, and little progress has been made on the vulnerable user proposal.

The Bike Fed also plans to lobby on the budget: asking legislators to maintain the $2.5 million in state money dedicated to bike and pedestrian paths. The state support was included, for the first time, in the 2009-’11 biennial budget.

Gov. Scott Walker eliminates that spending in his budget proposal for 2011-’13.

A third issue on the lobbying agenda is the access to state land purchased through the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship program. The program does not specify biking as a use on property acquired through the conservation program, and the sport is excluded, in some cases.

Lobbying is one element of the daylong summit in Madison.

Wisconsin Tourism Secretary Stephanie Klett will speak at the opening session starting at 9 a.m. in the Madison Concourse Hotel. During workshops throughout the day, advocates will share ideas on the bicycling business in the state, building local organizations and securing money for cycling projects.

Andreas Rohl, the head of bicycle programs in Copenhagen, Denmark, will deliver the keynote address Tuesday at 6 p.m.. In Copenhagen, Rohl has helped create one of the world’s best cities for bicycling as transportation.

107 Comments for "Deaths of cyclists drive lobbying effort for vulnerable users law"

  1. I as a motorist always go completely in the opposite lane when traffic is clear, when approaching a bike. But I have seen plenty of bicyclists that think they can ride in the middle of the road and not move for traffic. Hello, get off the road if you can not go the speed limit. I had a friend that hit a bike rider, not his fault, totally her fault. She was wearing black clothing at 5am in the morning, no lights or reflectors on the bike, bike riders also need to take precautions not just the car drivers.

    molly53150 Apr 18, 2011 9:29 AM

  2. Will motorcyclists be included in this law? One of the biggest problems people face when riding a motorcycle is right-of-way intrusion by vehicles.

    NorthwoodsJim Apr 18, 2011 9:50 AM

  3. NorthwoodsJim - Motorcyclists could be included. The definition of "vulnerable user" varies from state to state, but in general the groups include people on motorcycles and bicycles, pedestrians, roadway workers and people with disabilities.

    T. Held Apr 18, 2011 9:55 AM

  4. Stay off busy roads... I constantly see the same 2 bikers biking during rush hour on our busy roads... Are they playing Frogger or what???
    Also along the Bike trail by lake michigan I constantly see bikers on lake drive vs the bike path we built for them... And also i see bikers trying to take the whole lane of traffic instead of staying by the side of the road...
    Besides laws which most people dont know exist they bikers need to use some common sense... Same goes with cross walks 1/2 of motorists yields to pedestrians the other half ending up doing close calls....

    BVModerate Apr 18, 2011 10:00 AM

  5. And another thing... Why do bicycle riders wear helmets but dont have flashing lights at night... kinda hypocritical...

    BVModerate Apr 18, 2011 10:03 AM

  6. I love the 'blame the victim' approach toward cyclist fatalities. The common belief is cyclists cause the accidents, when in reality the majority (as per Tom Held - not an opinion) are in fact caused by distracted or DUI drivers. Is it really asking too much for people to just pay attention when they drive?

    And the penalties are a complete joke. The article reference two cases where the driver was completely at fault and one got away with no penalty and the other paid a minimal fine. It sounds like the Nashotah driver will get away with it, too. I'm sorry - but 'the sun was in my eyes' shouldn't be a valid excuse. If you can't safely drive with sun glare, maybe you shouldn't be driving.

    Please remember, while a lot of drivers have this irrational hatred of cyclists on the road - the cyclists are legally allowed to be there and they are still people with family, friends, and a life. And what is the harm in slowing down and passing them widely? A couple seconds of your time?

    umgopher1 Apr 18, 2011 10:06 AM

  7. I believe that bikes should be licensed like in the old days. They can pay part of the road tax to upkeep them. Why should taxpayers have to pay for those who like to bike. If I hunt I have to pay a fee to use public land, if I want to swim in state parks I have to buy a sticker, if I own a car - I have to pay for plates. Also bicycles should get tickets for not following rules of the road. If bikes get access to public lands for riding on - then I want access for my horses to use them as trails.

    horserider Apr 18, 2011 10:17 AM

  8. Everyone who really disagrees that bicycles should be on the road needs
    to read the DOT link that peppers posted (thank you for posting). There
    are illustrations to make it even more clear.

    "You will fare better with other road users if you function like a legal
    vehicle operator, which you are."

    Which you are! Share the road, people!

    cheetahslippers Apr 18, 2011 10:17 AM

  9. @umgopher1 - Please remember, while a lot of drivers have this irrational hatred of cyclists on the road - the cyclists are legally allowed to be there and they are still people with family, friends, and a life. And what is the harm in slowing down and passing them widely? A couple seconds of your time

    Unless your on a 2 lane highway rated at 50mph and the cyclist is taking up the whole lane going 5mph up hill and were are to swerve last minute and put our family at risk of a head on collision.... i beg to differ
    common sense saves lives more than laws...win the battle and lose the war...

    BVModerate Apr 18, 2011 10:19 AM

  10. "Also along the Bike trail by lake michigan I constantly see bikers on lake drive vs the bike path we built for them... "

    That's because the trail is full of parents with strollers and little kids, dogs, runners and, especially when you get up by Edgewood/Menlo, lots of elderly folks out for a stroll. We do not want to go 25-30 mph through a crowd like that and they proabably don't want us doing that either. So we ride on Lake Dr. and Lincoln Memorial.

    UnfrozenCaveman Apr 18, 2011 10:22 AM

  11. BVModerate - if you are paying attention while you drive, you will see the cyclist ahead of you and you won't have to "swerve last minute".

    And let's not exaggerate - have you ever honestly seen a cyclist riding right in the middle of a lane going up a hill? Trust me, as a cyclist I don't want you to hit me (apparently more than you don't want to hit me) and will not be riding in the middle of a road.

    umgopher1 Apr 18, 2011 10:27 AM

  12. Peppers - First of all - Bikes also have trails - many communities have trails you can ride your bikes, as stated in a previous post - "the trail is full of parents with strollers and little kids, dogs, runners and, especially when you get up by Edgewood/Menlo, lots of elderly folks out for a stroll. We do not want to go 25-30 mph through a crowd like that and they proabably don't want us doing that either. So we ride on Lake Dr. and Lincoln Memorial. " Second - I don't know what the fee you pay to your municipality is for - the fee I am suggesting is one for using roadways and public land - like the fees hunters pay. I know a lot of people who ride bikes and they do not have to pay for any type of licensing. Maybe the bike riders should also have to pass a drivers test to make sure they understand the rules of the road.

    horserider Apr 18, 2011 10:29 AM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives