Tuesday 21 May 2013

Summerfest files federal action to protect its Rock 'n Sole

running

Summerfest may lose its Rock ‘n Sole to the forces of Rock ‘n’ Roll, in a federal trademark battle being fought over the name of the inaugural run in Milwaukee.

Competitor Group Inc., the company behind the expanding Rock ‘n’ Roll marathon and half-marathon series, initiated the fight through a cease and desist letter that directs Milwaukee World Festival Inc. to drop the Rock ‘n Sole name for the half-marathon and 10K scheduled for July 10.

Competitor owns the trademarks for the Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon and 1/2 marathon titles, and considers the Rock ‘n Sole to be a riff close enough to violate that mark. The name would confuse participants and dilute the Rock ‘n Roll brand, according to the letter sent on March 11.

The element of confusion – whether a runner would think they’re signing on for a Rock ‘n’ Roll run, for example – is a key factor in trademark infringement cases.

Summerfest responded by filing a federal complaint seeking a court order to clear Rock ‘n Sole for its run.

In its filing, Summerfest argues that its Rock ‘n Sole name and logo are sufficiently different to avoid confusion and that its event does not compete in any of Competitor Group’s markets. It plans to put on a race exclusively connected to the music festival, now in its 44th year.

Roughly 2,500 runners have registered, so far, for the half-marathon and 10K races to be run on the Hoan Bridge and Milwaukee lakefront.

Competitor Group, based in San Diego, has expanded to 19 races across the country; but none in Milwaukee or Wisconsin. There have been preliminary talks to bring a Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon to Milwaukee, but no solid proposals have been publicized.

Too close? Here are the logos for the Rock 'n Sole and Rock 'n' Roll races,
from their respective web sites.

18 Comments for "Summerfest files federal action to protect its Rock 'n Sole"

  1. Are you kidding me? Great way to waste taxpayer dollars. They sound alike, but are "Different " words. I guess I should not be surprised on this type of frivolous lawsuit in the great USA, brought to this level by the scummy lawyers. Didn't Paris Hilton want to copyright "That's Hot", and I thought we were close to seeing the color "yellow" being Lance Armstrongs personal color, and we would have to pay a fee to wear anything yellow. I gotta go, I just burned my tongue on a starbucks coffee, I smell a lawsuit- oh wait, they are in financial trouble, make that McDonalds.

    moto3111969 Mar 29, 2011 7:34 PM

  2. Who's complaining? Just a bunch of people discussing the article. I think
    it's a great addition as well. Signed up two months ago. Too bad about
    the potential lawsuit, though. "Cola Cola" is different from the brand we
    are familiar, but I bet Coke would be opposed to me selling a soda with
    that name in a red and white can...regardless of the typeface used.

    gtbadger Mar 29, 2011 8:07 PM

Post a Comment

Limit of 2000 characters,  characters remaining

Preview

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Please login to post a comment.

Page Tools

Latest Posts

Archives